Via Jim Geraghty I find that Michele Bachmann is playing fast and loose with the “statistical dead heat” terminology.
It’s bad enough when people pretend that the Margin of Error is a band of uniform probability, and not a bell curve where the extremes are unlikely. But what Bachmann’s email is saying is beyond belief.
Polling is not a difficult science to understand. It’s difficult to do well, but no in-depth knowledge of statistics is required to read and understand a poll. Just basic probability is all that’s needed. Once you can visualize what a probability density curve looks like, you know all you need to know in order to read a poll and get an idea for what it’s actually saying.
It pains me when a major Presidential campaign at best hopes the candidate’s supporters will buy this, or at worst the team doesn’t grasp it themselves.
Comments
No Responses to “Michele Bachmann fails Reading Polls 101”